00:00
00:00
iamwontolla

39 Audio Reviews w/ Response

All 68 Reviews

Not a bad start! Adding some reverb and parallel compression will help make this beat feel warmer, and sort of glue it all together. I like the chord choices!

Father-of-Death responds:

thanks yea some better mastering woulda been smart but i'm lazy

the song was supposed to be just workin on chords so thanks for noticing :)

Cute! Clean mix, and enough energy in the drop.

VaultKid responds:

Thanks, I am happy you like it :D

I think the remastering works a lot better on this one, without the drums getting in the way. Recording live drums is still a pain, and it gets worse the fewer mics you have to work with, so I don't blame them at all.
The steps you mentioned cleaned this up a lot, without harming the sound quality much. There's a tiny amount of hiss in that back that gives it just the right amount of vintage charm. If you want to do more mastering like this, I'd look into finding an exciter plugin that can add stereo width. Obviously it won't be like starting from a full stereo mix, but even with mono, just that tiny bit of width can add a lot on headphones.

seatellite responds:

They didn't even have enough microphones to record live drums, so they had to use a drum machine and mix everything down each time they recorded something to access more tracks.
Ironically, The Beatles, which were their biggest influence, used this same method throughout their career to achieve multi-tracking & fake stereo back in the day lol
Also I did experiment with a few exciter plugins as well, but because of the audio quality of the recordings, it was really hard to use them without introducing more clipping.
In the end my objective was just to make the original tracks more listenable while leaving as much as the original as possible.
If I was able to get the original tapes in high-quality and re-record them digitally myself, I could have definitely done a lot more, but it was difficult with what was essentially a chain of tape to a digital 128kbps m4a file.

Thanks for the review and I hope you enjoyed the songwriting itself!

I love the way you took that rave string sample and turned it into a whole hook by moving it around one note at a time. Try exploring stuff like that more, and see what else you can do with that pattern on other instruments.
The two biggest problems I see here are emptiness and compression. The arrangement needs some background sounds to fill out certain parts where it feels way too empty, and the right sounds can add a lot to that uneasy atmosphere. The cello melody feels random too (and not in a good way), so adding some pads or bass to anchor it would help it feel random on purpose, if that makes any sense.
Some sounds would benefit from some compression too, either to make them sound fuller, or to even out big jumps in volume. Those filter sweeps get really loud at some points, overpowering everything else to the point that you can see it in the waveform, and some compression could help even that out without needing to change any of the sound design.

SodatheJunker responds:

Thanks you so much for the response.

I really can't fill it out too much, the "emptiness" is actually to keep it open and vacant for the sake of sound design and the character voice tracks. The area is very damp and echoing.

That said, I'm 100% agree the compression and leveling of the mix has to be addressed, I don't remember if that was intentional or not at the time but there's so many ways it can be cleaned up on a second run. I may even flip that whole second part on it's head since at the time I was using a tweaked and modulated sample, while now I have plenty of instruments and ways to record my own work. This is one I'm really excited to get into when the time comes, I feel like there's tons of potential here still.

I had mentioned this in another song from this project, I forget which, but these tracks are actually all being revisited with hopes of cleaning, updating, and generally just making much better. So any and all advice and and critique is extremely appreciated ^^ If you have any opinions on other tracks from the "DiCE" project, please voice them! Everyone has been super constructive here.

You're off to a good start! Check your mix against other melodic dubstep tracks and make sure it's hitting hard enough. For example, try adding a heavier bass under the chords to fill out the lower mids, and scoop the mids in the chords to make room for the melody/arp. There are also some parts (ie 1:16) where it doesn't sound like the bass is playing the right note, so check those.

IndexatioN responds:

Oh yeah, thanks for your review and especially for those tips :)

Good writing! Watch your stereo field when you're mixing; some of the wider sounds are distracting from the leads (which are down the middle).

FlyMaX responds:

Thank you, I will consider your advice!

Where's the bass? There's no low end in the whole song. If you make any kind of EDM, you need something to carry the sub bass and get that thump. The sounds are also super dry because there's no reverb. More variation wouldn't hurt either, but the real thing this is missing is some sweet buildups. Listen to more Goa and see how the songs are structured (how they use loud and quiet parts), and how much reverb it uses to make it sound big and roomy.
E: "EDM" is short for electronic dance music. This is dance music, and it's electronic. Plus everything else I said.

Jeansowaty responds:

EDM? Nice try!

The melody sounds like random notes and chords, learning some basic music theory (scales, chords, keys) will help you write a more cohesive and memorable melody. The sample leading into the drop is the wrong tempo, and that's important, since the listener will need the sample to know the exact moment the beat drops, so either stretch it so it's in time, or use a different sample.
The drop "bass" has no actual bass and it's in the wrong key. Layering another bass under it, with more actual low end, and EQing it, will help a little, but it's just not a very interesting sound because there's no movement, just the same noise for the entire drop. Break it up with some other sounds, to give it more interesting rhythms.
Finally, get rid of the limiter on the master channel, PLEASE, it just makes everything sound bad. Find some tutorials for mastering if you want it to be loud, otherwise, just turn down the volume.

Skandor responds:

*SNEAK 100*

Cute! With tighter production, this will sound great. Digging the Tokyo Machine influence.

Yirokos responds:

Thanks alot man, appricate it a ton!

how did a piece in "E major" end up in C minor lol

anyway it's built around some good ideas, not a bad start, but the arrangement doesn't evolve over time nearly as much as it could. production is clear but it's garageband so there's not much to do on that side anyway

JamesTheMuttz responds:

Hey Thanks for the feedback!

First off I can't tell if a song is in C minor or E major to save my life (I make music but I know nothing terminology wise)

secondly I know I could have made it better but my iPod's onscreen keypad is 3 and 1/4 inches small (should have used the iPad)

I do appreciate your feedback and will try to make something better in the future! (maybe in Ableton Live 9!) :3

Signed,

Pack Man3.

Electronic/metal, producing since 2011

Male

Burlington, VT, US

Joined on 11/28/16

Level:
3
Exp Points:
91 / 100
Exp Rank:
> 100,000
Vote Power:
3.40 votes
Audio Scouts
4
Rank:
Civilian
Global Rank:
> 100,000
Blams:
0
Saves:
0
B/P Bonus:
0%
Whistle:
Normal
Trophies:
2
Medals:
10